Mobius wrote: And me.

While I don't think that AoA is better than WiH, I kind of disagree with your statement. Let people think whatever they want, there's no need to criticize someone else's tastes.

So you don't actually agree with him, you just say you do to troll. Got it.

ngtm1r wrote:

Mobius wrote: And me.

While I don't think that AoA is better than WiH, I kind of disagree with your statement. Let people think whatever they want, there's no need to criticize someone else's tastes.

So you don't actually agree with him, you just say you do to troll. Got it.

Looked to me like what he said was fairly clear. You, on the other hand, seem to be trolling quite deftly.

If the guy wants me to describe into the details why I think WiH is a good but not a great campaign, I can proceed. I'm not trolling.

CIH wrote:Reminds me of my effort to shamelessly use a Feisar as a basis for a light interceptor years ago. I wonder what happened to that plan, I had forgotten all about it....

Was it W2097's Feisar model?

ShadowGorrath wrote:

ngtm1r wrote:It's good work. Maybe talk to the War In Heaven guys about a second-gen UEF fighter, wartime expendient.

Why does everything new have to be for WiH...

It doesn't. Anything new we got we'd probably pass around.

Speaking of which, Mobius, I've got something I want to give you. I think it could be put to awesome use in INFASA.

Mobius wrote:If the guy wants me to describe into the details why I think WiH is a good but not a great campaign, I can proceed. I'm not trolling.

CIH wrote:Reminds me of my effort to shamelessly use a Feisar as a basis for a light interceptor years ago. I wonder what happened to that plan, I had forgotten all about it....

Was it W2097's Feisar model?

Uh, dunno. Just grabbed screenies off of google, spent maybe half an hour in Max then pretty much forgot all about it....

Matthew wrote:Looked to me like what he said was fairly clear. You, on the other hand, seem to be trolling quite deftly.

I sincerely recommend you try reading the thread first then.

Since basically Mobius says "I agree with you! But I don't agree with you." It's either being ineptly spoke or trolling.

ngtm1r wrote:

Matthew wrote:Looked to me like what he said was fairly clear. You, on the other hand, seem to be trolling quite deftly.

I sincerely recommend you try reading the thread first then.

Since basically Mobius says "I agree with you! But I don't agree with you." It's either being ineptly spoke or trolling.

You just can't admit you're wrong here, can you?

ShadowGorrath wrote: You just can't admit you're wrong here, can you?

If I'm wrong, prove it. If you have this magical secret new understanding, present it and be hailed by the High Maxes and Trashmans of the world as the man who took me down.

Of course, we know why you can't do it. Why you didn't.

You don't have it.

You are a fake.

ngtm1r wrote:

ShadowGorrath wrote: You just can't admit you're wrong here, can you?

If I'm wrong, prove it. If you have this magical secret new understanding, present it and be hailed by the High Maxes and Trashmans of the world as the man who took me down.

Of course, we know why you can't do it. Why you didn't.

You don't have it.

You are a fake.

Oh why don't you stop acting like a damn primadona and give it a rest? You're just making a big fool of yourself by now. Not to mention when you start generalising everyone and comparing them to people that don't fit your definition of a normal person...

Don't make me perform something vaguely resembling moderator action here, people.

Top Gun wrote:Don't make me perform something vaguely resembling moderator action here, people.

Please do

ShadowGorrath wrote: Oh why don't you stop acting like a damn primadona and give it a rest? You're just making a big fool of yourself by now. Not to mention when you start generalising everyone and comparing them to people that don't fit your definition of a normal person...

Well, you name somebody else who'd like to see it then? I suppose there's Mobius to that list, and perhaps yourself, but then the people I named are still on it and thus valid entries to a list of people who would applaud. Their pyschological weirdnesses or lack thereof aren't really relevant, so I'm not sure why you brought it up except to try and insult me.

And why do you want to give it a rest? You started it.

Top Gun wrote:Don't make me perform something vaguely resembling moderator action here, people.

Wait, SG can do that!?

ngtm1r wrote:

Top Gun wrote:Don't make me perform something vaguely resembling moderator action here, people.

Wait, SG can do that!?

I know, I was shocked too. I think the only thing I've ever used it for is deleting an adbot post.