Page 1 of 2
Database Restored
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 4:21 pm
by Hunter
Well I got the database back - No thanks to the admins, I did it all myself. The site, however, is another matter entirely.
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 4:55 pm
by Floyd
So...you lost everything?l
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 5:02 pm
by Hunter
no I have backups, but they aren't brand new.. Still 15 days newer than the admins.
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 5:25 pm
by Black Wolf
Well, at least the forums came back - I doubt there'd been all _that_ much added to the site recently, right?
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 5:39 pm
by Singh
well....at least the forums are here, and you ARE faring quite a bit better than HLP atm. (it's down again).
*gives hunter coffee in a pitifull attempt at keeping him going

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:28 pm
by Hunter
Nah, nothing that can't be restored on the site, mainly because of the only updates are from my end (like the TI site).
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:32 pm
by Moonsword
The site's been updated?
*ignores website and goes back to testing Inferno and a little bit of FREDing*
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:44 pm
by Hunter
No.. back-dated, actually.
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:48 pm
by kasperl
Hunter wrote:No.. back-dated, actually.
I wonder, wouldn't that be down-dated?
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:49 pm
by Hunter
It probably would. The cheek of it, the admin restored a 30 day old backup. How pathetic is that? So I restored a 16 day old backup on top of it. And there is still something wrong with the site, because I've using 40% more disk space than actually IS being used.
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:51 pm
by kasperl
Perhaps the two back-ups partially overlapping?
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:53 pm
by Hunter
The disk usage error was present before removing the 30 day backup.
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:54 pm
by kasperl
Contact the admins?
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:55 pm
by Hunter
After their brilliant support the first and second time around?
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:59 pm
by kasperl
It might help...
Do make back-ups before complaining though.