Page 1 of 1
baby carriers
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 7:28 am
by sesun
Banned, but I kept the picture because it's cute - are we sure thats a baby in there? - Hunt
Re: baby carriers
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 2:04 pm
by Black Wolf
I was hoping this would be a topic about small carriers in FS2.

Re: baby carriers
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 5:08 pm
by aldo
Baby carriers are surprisingly complicated.
Re: baby carriers
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 2:17 am
by Hunter
They tend to be frowned upon in the UK (at least the parts I come from) - I guess because everyone wants to clutter the streets and block up the buses with those monster prams from day 1. Yet here in Korea it's the other way around - it's the pram lovers that are frowned upon because they think a baby should be close to a warm bodied person.
Re: baby carriers
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:05 am
by Black Wolf
Not surprising, really - Baby Orangutans are in constant skin to skin contact with their mothers for the first six months of life - in comparison to other primates, humans have a relatively loose physical relationship with their offspring.
Re: baby carriers
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 4:33 pm
by aldo
Hunter wrote:They tend to be frowned upon in the UK (at least the parts I come from)
They are? That's news to me. Admittedly I don't see many (except for the toddler-size backpack versions), but that's possibly because any woman who's just given birth is too bloody sore to actually carry a baby using one (and men, natch, are still expected to go back to work after two weeks rather than have a sensible length of paternity leave).
Re: baby carriers
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 1:20 am
by Hunter
From the reactions of people I've spoken to, they seem to think that baby carriers are for poor people only...*cue rollseyes*
I dislike such a reaction and strongly defend baby carriers whenever anyone turns their nose up.
Infact, turning ones nose up is a very Southern reaction, is it not?
Re: baby carriers
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:41 pm
by aldo
Hunter wrote:From the reactions of people I've spoken to, they seem to think that baby carriers are for poor people only...*cue rollseyes*
I dislike such a reaction and strongly defend baby carriers whenever anyone turns their nose up.
For poor people?
Twats.
Infact, turning ones nose up is a very Southern reaction, is it not?
I wish it was.
Re: baby carriers
Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:23 am
by Top Gun
I know I've seen some concern about the kind where the baby faces the wearer, since I think there have been a few cases of babies nearly suffocating in them.
Re: baby carriers
Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 12:17 pm
by aldo
Top Gun wrote:I know I've seen some concern about the kind where the baby faces the wearer, since I think there have been a few cases of babies nearly suffocating in them.
That was the 'sling' kind, though, not the kind above. With that kind, the baby
has to face the wearer anyway - the neck isn't strong enough to support looking out the way.
Re: baby carriers
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:02 am
by Top Gun
Ah, okay. I'm not yet well-versed in newborn conveyance.