Page 1 of 1

First Piece

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:38 am
by Vasudan Admiral
Well, I have absolutely no musical background and can't play any instrument whatsoever, so naturally I decided to start out by trying to compose an original orchestral track on my first go in an unfamilier program. I mean, doesn't everyone? :p

Here's the result: http://sectorfiles.net/ti-file-dump/Vas ... 1_WIP5.mp3

It turned out better than I expected, but I know it's still far from good. ;)

So, lacking any clue about what is good and what is not, I figure I'll ask you lot. What sort of things should I focus on doing when I eventually get around to trying a second one?

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:42 pm
by Stryker
Pretty nice. Definitely impressive for a first piece. One thing you might work on in orchestral pieces is variation--in an orchestral piece you may repeat the same melody twice, but only with substantial variation between the first and second repetitions, and usually quite a bit of separation between the first and second time the line is played.

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:41 pm
by spkid64
mmm...interesting. i especially enjoy the snares. not bad for a first piece. my first song i made was absolute crap looking back. yours sounds majestic but needs variation (but not *too* much). unfortunately, i'm not very fond of this style of music so i can't really offer my opinion on it.

(as for my first piece, maybe i'll upload it someday so everyone can see how far i've come ;) )

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:47 pm
by Hunter
My first piece is lost in hundreds of years of corrupted discs. And to be true, with the equipment and lack of software I used back then, it pales in comparison to the stuff you can whip together in 30 seconds with todays stuff.

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:52 pm
by Flipside
Sounds good, very Sci-fi, though, in my opinion, a little bit too punchy in the Bass range, but sounding very promising. For my own part, I think it needs a 'hook', a theme that is recognisable, it got a nice melody but it tends to wander around a lot, that can work, but it sometimes helps to have a much shorter 'hook' counter-melody that gives form to the main melody. If I have time, I'll knock together an example of what I mean :)

Edit : I've actually just made contact with someone who has tape recordings of the tunes I did when I was about 16 and in a rock band, I'm planning to digitise it once I can get my hands on them, I might post one or two of those if I'm drunk enough ;)

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:21 am
by Vasudan Admiral
Ok, thanks all. :)
And Flip, that would be excellent. :D

So variation is probably most important thing. Does that mean variation in the tune, variation in the instruments used to make that tune (and their start - stop timings) or something else?

Another question; I did this piece in a really basic chorus-stanza-chorus format - should I change that?

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:32 am
by spkid64
variation is change of melody AND a difference in how you use melody (when: often or every once in a while)
as for chorus-stanza-chorus, that doesn't matter. arrange the sound however you'd like to. try adding more instruments to give it more effects. i noticed the song doesn't really have many cool effects (like a breakup of the melody, large change of drums) so play around with it and try to add some effects.

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:30 am
by Stryker
The chorus-stanza format is excellent for orchestral work such as this, so long as the chorus and stanzas are very definite. That's really what adds variation in a piece like this--having stanzas that change factors such as the backbeat or the timing of the notes as well as instrumentation. A change in lead instruments accents the differences between chorus and stanzas even further and renews a listener's interest in the song.

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:03 pm
by Vasudan Admiral
Awesome - I'll try that when I next need a break from building ships. :)
Thanks.