Sectorgame

heh, I understand that.... I can be equally blunt at times.

haha yep, somtimes its a good thing sometimes its a bad thing

although there really isnt too much i say i cant back up

Blunt is good. Blunt means that you cannot be misconstrued at a later date. Blunt mean that you're meaning can be understood by anyone capable of understanding the issue.

I could care less about popularity. I just mentioned I wasn't. Queen is awesome!

Gackt > *



<*}}}--<

karajorma wrote:

Flipside wrote:Freddy Mercury was Gay.

Actually I think he was bisexual.

To be honet, I don't think anyone ever really knew for certain, which is all for the better, seeing as it really is none of our business anyway

Most of the things that we concern ourselves with, and sometimes even make our life goals, are none of anybodies business.

Make sense of that statement.

That's the crux of the homosexual argument. I and most of the anti crowd aren't so much anti, what you do in the privacy of you're own home is you're business. It only becomes my business if you bring it into the public sphere.

You can be as gay, promiscuous, whatever you want in the private(be it in your home or away from reasonable public access), but(and this goes for all the couples who think it's cool to play tonsil hockey in public) you have to go into it with full knowledge of the consequences and the understanding that no matter what you do, society will at least be put off by it, more likely denegrate you for it, should it be made public.

The Gay Lobby are the ones forcing the issue, they should realize that they are the ones outside society and that they are hated all the more for trying to force society to accept them.

Do what you do, make music, be funny, whatever, just leave you're damned politics and personal stuff out of it.

liberator wrote:That's the crux of the homosexual argument. I and most of the anti crowd aren't so much anti, what you do in the privacy of you're own home is you're business. It only becomes my business if you bring it into the public sphere.

You can be as gay, promiscuous, whatever you want in the private(be it in your home or away from reasonable public access), but(and this goes for all the couples who think it's cool to play tonsil hockey in public) you have to go into it with full knowledge of the consequences and the understanding that no matter what you do, society will at least be put off by it, more likely denegrate you for it, should it be made public.

The Gay Lobby are the ones forcing the issue, they should realize that they are the ones outside society and that they are hated all the more for trying to force society to accept them.

Do what you do, make music, be funny, whatever, just leave you're damned politics and personal stuff out of it.

Exactly.

A good argument, but I have to ask this: if it was a man and a woman doing this, what right do they have?

Equality goes both ways, Liberator. And some of the issues they're arguing about are valid. I do have to admit one thing: public affection is probably getting a little out of control... for both straights and gays.

I, for one, have yet to see two men making out in public.
Women I've seen, in school in florida. And the crowd was encouraging them.

Some double standard.

There were two guys going for it at a club I was at the other night - bouncer broke them up quick smart.

Raa wrote:Women I've seen, in school in florida. And the crowd was encouraging them.

Hell yeah Spring Break in Panama CIty is great

liberator wrote:That's the crux of the homosexual argument. I and most of the anti crowd aren't so much anti, what you do in the privacy of you're own home is you're business. It only becomes my business if you bring it into the public sphere.

You can be as gay, promiscuous, whatever you want in the private(be it in your home or away from reasonable public access), but(and this goes for all the couples who think it's cool to play tonsil hockey in public) you have to go into it with full knowledge of the consequences and the understanding that no matter what you do, society will at least be put off by it, more likely denegrate you for it, should it be made public.

The Gay Lobby are the ones forcing the issue, they should realize that they are the ones outside society and that they are hated all the more for trying to force society to accept them.

Do what you do, make music, be funny, whatever, just leave you're damned politics and personal stuff out of it.

Are you saying that homosexual couples should not admit to be homosexual or display that in public, or what?

i.e. if 2 men or women (probably harder to tell with the latter) walk down the street holding hands, do you have an objection?

Yes. I object to overt public displays of affection, gay or straight. At home is okay, in private is okay, but not in public.