what kind of massive flaws/weaknesses?

It's very large and thus vulnerable to small craft that can get under it's defensive perimeter.

If the design is 30 years old, it's liable to have a host of compatibility with newer hardware, ie fewer or weaker PBCs and AAA.

well, Grim said it had specific player exploitable flaws...

Fewer/weaker AAA is highly player-exploitable.

Hippo wrote:well, Grim said it had specific player exploitable flaws...

Fighterbay with no invisible texture?

How long is this thing gonna take to destroy if its that big?

Depends how long you set the supernova timer for in FRED I guess...

:roflmfao:

aldo wrote:Fighterbay with no invisible texture?

well, there is that.

plus, it has lucifer-style reactors, those are exploitable.

also, theres much fewer turrets on the bottom of the ship than the top.


and also, when i say it was 30 years old, i meant its a 30-year-old design, not a 30-year-old ship. is been upgraded and designed to be flexible, kinda like a futuristic plug 'n play thing.
besides, its a GTVA ship. the player doesnt need to exploit flaws

Grimloq wrote:

aldo wrote:Fighterbay with no invisible texture?

besides, its a GTVA ship. the player doesnt need to exploit flaws

I said that before!

i know. yo uwere right.

Chalk up another tally for the 'overgrown Terran battlewagon' category, then.

*chalks up another tally for oversized, cheesey terran battlewagon*

done

[edit] and BTW, moonsword, not to sound rude, but do you EVER smile? you never seem at all enthusiastic about anything, and maybe even a little bit downer-ish... again, no offence...

Oh, I smile. I was actually making a joke, there, referencing the number of large Terran dreadnoughts/juggernauts/super-destroyers.

well, its cuz terran ships are A: easy to make, B: its very easy to oversize a blocky ship, and C: terrans seem to be everyones favorite