Sectorgame

Matthew wrote:It was implied by context.

What context? I gave you specific incidents that were non-suicide. If you can pull suicide from that context, you've got issues.

Not only that but he misread your original statement as saying it was the bombing that caused mental damage, when you said it was the fervent belief that did it.

Double comprehension fail?

Given that NGTM-1R almost certainly was replying to me and I quite clearly stated I was on about suicide bombing maybe you guys should stop being dicks to Matthew.

karajorma wrote:Given that NGTM-1R almost certainly was replying to me and I quite clearly stated I was on about suicide bombing maybe you guys should stop being dicks to Matthew.

I think I'm being a deck to you too, since you're making equally little sense.

What I'm saying is that maybe you should look at the thread and see why Matthew might have thought you were on about suicide bombers.

It should be pretty obvious if you actually stop to think about it.


And once you've done that maybe you can all stop with the kind of dickwaderry that is so prevalent on HLP that the main reason I come to SG is to escape it for a bit.

Thank you karajorma.

It's an understandable ambiguity but hopefully it's clear by now what NGTM-1R was actually after, which was a point about the effects of fanatical belief (whether you agree with it or not is a separate issue).

karajorma wrote:
What I'm saying is that maybe you should look at the thread and see why Matthew might have thought you were on about suicide bombers.

Since I'm still not sure why you thought that, much less Matthew, no, I can't really. I mean, I posted before that about a delay and cited non-suicide examples. I really can't get much more clear. The most recent examples of attempted major bombings in the news as well, like the Heathrow and Times Square failures, were also non-suicide attempts. So no matter if you reach inside or outside the topic for your reference I simply can't understand why you'd transition directly to suicide bombing being implied.

I apologize if my attempt to discourage Matthew from drive-by posting in topics he doesn't bother to fully read or understand annoys you, but it's not going to stop as long as he continues to do so. I suggest you get comfy.

Well if it was a good costume...

ghhyrd wrote:Well if it was a good costume...

Yeah, it's pretty hard making a good Hitler costume. Or so I've heard.

Pardon me good sir? I read the entire thread.

karajorma wrote:

ngtm1r wrote:The sad truth is the students would probably plan and execute better than anyone who's actually conducted one, with a few exceptions such as Lockerbie and the Alfred P. Murray building.

I still think there is some validity in the theory that terrorist activities are increasingly being carried out by the retarded because good suicide bombers are already dead.

This post, directly preceding NGTM1R's post, specifically refers to suicide bombing. As NGTM1R's post is obviously a reply to this post, I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that he is referring to suicide bombing as well.

Only if you don't actually read what Karaj's quoting. Which apparently he himself didn't.

Hey aldo when did you become a god

Snail wrote:Hey aldo when did you become a god

I have always been a god, Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Aldo G'lasgo wgah'nagl fhtagn.