Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 4:00 pm
...
That theres a warpstorm wiki makes me laugh.
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 5:54 pm
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:20 pm
Y'know, Clio's have a reputation for rear wheel arch rot.......aldo wrote:ah, so presumably the rusty bits fall off and crush the unsuspecting vandal.Roanoke wrote:well it is a Rover.....
it is a rover he drives isn't it ?
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:02 pm
Uh huh, and I do have a tiny touch of rust. On the other hand, it's only a stopgap until I buy a PorscheRoanoke wrote:Y'know, Clio's have a reputation for rear wheel arch rot.......aldo wrote:ah, so presumably the rusty bits fall off and crush the unsuspecting vandal.Roanoke wrote:well it is a Rover.....
it is a rover he drives isn't it ?
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:18 pm
Which Porsche?
911? 944? Carerra?
911? 944? Carerra?
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:53 pm
A cheap one......... I'll see if I get promoted next year firstTaristin wrote:Which Porsche?
911? 944? Carerra?
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:37 am
In all seriouslness, if you're willing to go back as far as the late 80's (never go early 80s, the chassis were baws) you could actually get one for unnder 6000.
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:48 am
For that kind of money... (assuming a 2:1 GBP:USD ratio) I'd say screw it, and look for a 93 Supra Turbo... Or RX-7...
Or NSX-T
Or NSX-T
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:06 pm
or better still
with a late model Turbo engine. Old car, new engine. Best of both worlds.
*drool*
the original 2.7 RS *more drool*
If you're thinking eighties I'd go for a 911 ClubSport. The Turbo is for 80s yuppies. The Targa more so.
*drool*
what?what?what? the earlier the better!vyper wrote:In all seriouslness, if you're willing to go back as far as the late 80's (never go early 80s, the chassis were baws) you could actually get one for unnder 6000.
If you're thinking eighties I'd go for a 911 ClubSport. The Turbo is for 80s yuppies. The Targa more so.
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:28 pm
Why get a cheapie?vyper wrote:In all seriouslness, if you're willing to go back as far as the late 80's (never go early 80s, the chassis were baws) you could actually get one for unnder 6000.
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 3:24 pm
Cause you're a software dev in Glasgow?aldo wrote:Why get a cheapie?vyper wrote:In all seriouslness, if you're willing to go back as far as the late 80's (never go early 80s, the chassis were baws) you could actually get one for unnder 6000.
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:41 pm
While I am indeed partial to that design, I like the curved 90's model so much more.Roanoke wrote:or better still
with a late model Turbo engine. Old car, new engine. Best of both worlds.
*drool*
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:09 pm
is that so you can pretend to be Brian Earl Spilner with you're ricer buddies ? 
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:23 pm
No, that's why not....vyper wrote:Cause you're a software dev in Glasgow?aldo wrote:Why get a cheapie?vyper wrote:In all seriouslness, if you're willing to go back as far as the late 80's (never go early 80s, the chassis were baws) you could actually get one for unnder 6000.
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 12:50 am
Roanoke wrote:is that so you can pretend to be Brian Earl Spilner with you're ricer buddies ?
As opposed to being Initial D with what you drive? o.'.O
I swear, you elitists who think that a Japanese sports car = rice are really quite infuriating.