Page 9 of 24

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:40 am
by Top Gun
With extreme prejudice. :D

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:51 am
by Flipside
hehehehe You'll probably be the cause of Kaz's next thread ;)

Welcome aboard by the way, I know your opinions don't always match mine, but that's what opinions are for :D

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 4:22 am
by WeatherOp
If it is as bad as you guys say his threads are, I'll help. :)

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 4:24 am
by Flipside
Hmmmmmmmm.. all I will say on the matter is that I'm actually glad he's not religious, since I would half expect him to be arrested for trying to burn a medical student at the stake ;)

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 4:28 am
by liberator
Careful WeatherOp. We have a history with it...er, him. Alot of this is in good fun, but I don't want you to get banned for being a "hitman" as it were.:)

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 4:28 am
by Taristin
Yeah, I'm kinda glad he's on my side (even if only a little) because he is... crazy.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 4:45 am
by WeatherOp
I've read a little bit of some things he said, and it made me mad allready. And if I would help it would just be to back up what you guys would say. :)

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:35 am
by liberator
It's less about being right and wrong these day though. In the beginning, sure, but now it's the same thing over and over again because we don't give much ground. Most of the fun we have at Kaz's expense is to keep him from having a coronary episode because he feels we're attacking him personally when we support certain points of view that don't coincide with his 100%.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:58 am
by Top Gun
Hehe, when Kazan gets back on the forums, maybe I should try and start a thread that will be guaranteed to get him pissed. "The First Amendment suxorz!!1" :p Seriously, though, I'll agree with you in that it's a good thing he's not religious; we might have the equivalent of a suicide bomber on our hands if he was.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:02 am
by Flipside
WeatherOp wrote:I've read a little bit of some things he said, and it made me mad allready. And if I would help it would just be to back up what you guys would say. :)
Actually, the general idea is not to 'say' anything, simply whenever one of these threads explosed into a fury of anti-religion insults, simply post a picture of your favourite marsupial, though I suggest that we expand that to include unusual looking sea creatures and packets of crisps, just to throw them off the scent ;)

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:48 am
by aldo
Flipside wrote:
WeatherOp wrote:I've read a little bit of some things he said, and it made me mad allready. And if I would help it would just be to back up what you guys would say. :)
Actually, the general idea is not to 'say' anything, simply whenever one of these threads explosed into a fury of anti-religion insults, simply post a picture of your favourite marsupial, though I suggest that we expand that to include unusual looking sea creatures and packets of crisps, just to throw them off the scent ;)
If we're going to introduce crisps, we should include classic 1980s cartoons such as a Dangermouse, MASK and Button Moon.

Or maybe just some pictures of windmills ;)

NB: from earlier
aldo wrote: The animals shall be deployed whenever Kazan (or anyone else) uses caps lock, red text, oversized bold text, or that incredibly annoying underscored _ILIKETOUNDERLINESTUFF_ type text is used.

It can be known as the Furry-um Project.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:11 pm
by Moonsword
_You mean like this?_

_Or_ _maybe_ _like_ _this_ _?_

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:33 pm
by aldo
NO, I _MEAN_ like THIS, you FOOL!!!11 You are _INFRINGING_ my RIGHTS!

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:50 pm
by Black Wolf
Ja. It was never meant to be anti Kazan - just anti OTTness.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:19 pm
by Moonsword
aldo wrote:NO, I _MEAN_ like THIS, you FOOL!!!11 You are _INFRINGING_ my RIGHTS!
Yeah, that looks about right. Good impression, by the way.