
*fails geography*
Think of it as a bunch of states united under the United Kingdom. It's exactly analagous to the states united under the United States (at least at the beginning). It makes no more sense to say the United Kingdom is England than it does to say the United States is Texas.Grug wrote:I thought Wales was in England?
*fails geography*
You telling me it isn't? Our monarch, and latest leader of the Bush Dynasty is Texan...Goober5000 wrote:Think of it as a bunch of states united under the United Kingdom. It's exactly analagous to the states united under the United States (at least at the beginning). It makes no more sense to say the United Kingdom is England than it does to say the United States is Texas.Grug wrote:I thought Wales was in England?
*fails geography*
LMAO.Taristin wrote:You telling me it isn't? Our monarch, and latest leader of the Bush Dynasty is Texan...Goober5000 wrote:Think of it as a bunch of states united under the United Kingdom. It's exactly analagous to the states united under the United States (at least at the beginning). It makes no more sense to say the United Kingdom is England than it does to say the United States is Texas.Grug wrote:I thought Wales was in England?
*fails geography*
Return to “General Discussion”